Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - phomann

Pages: [1] 2 3 4
1
NXPTM M522XX, KINETIS and i.MX RT / Re: Visual C ++ errors
« on: August 23, 2015, 10:53:48 PM »
Hi,

Hi,

I came across this problem as well. It is because there are two copies of the file cvtres.exe

I ended up just changing the name of one of them. I found the solution on the web.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
It turned out that I had two versions of this utility. One at C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio 10.0\VC\BIN\cvtres.exe and one at C:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v4.0.30319\cvtres.exe. After VS2012 install, the VS2010 version of cvtres.exe will no longer work. If that's the first one in your path, and the linker decides it needs to convert a .res file to COFF object format, the link will fail with LNK1123.

(Really annoying that the error message has nothing to do with the actual problem, but that's not unusual for a Microsoft product.)

Just delete/rename the older version of the utility, or re-arrange your PATH variable, so that the version that works comes first.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cheers,

Peter

2
Hi Mark,

It looks good, I'm going to check this out. I'm just waiting on approval by Freescale to be able to download it.

Have to tested it with the K60 and K20 variants in uTasker 1.4.5?

Cheers,

Peter

3
STTM STM32 and STR91XF / Re: STM32 F4 Cortex M4 devices
« on: November 17, 2011, 12:33:38 AM »
Hi Mark,

I'm still looking for an alternative to the LM3s9B9XX chips. The C5 errata stats that they only guarantee 100 flash writes. Totally useless for an internal file system.

I want a chip with an integrated Ethernet PHY and USB. At this stage my option seems to be the LM3S6965 with a FTDI  USB chip.

Cheers,

Peter. 

4
µTasker general / Re: Zero-configuration protocol (AUTO-IP)
« on: August 05, 2011, 12:55:32 AM »
Hi Mark,

CAn you send me the new luminary files as well?

Cheers,

Peter.

5
µTasker general / Re: New USB MSD Boot Loader
« on: June 07, 2011, 01:23:07 AM »
Hi Peter

Not yet. I am presently trying to get it operational on the LPC2XXX (then it should automaticalyl work also for the LPC17XX).
Following that I will add it to the LM3Sxxx package - which however means the older devices (not the 9Bxx) since these have USB support and the newer ones not yet. If that all runs smoothly I will look at upgrading the USB driver for the 9Bxx parts; I don't know how much work this will be though.

Regards

Mark


Hi Mark,

Thanks for that. With the non availability of the new TI parts, it may be time to change processors. I liked the TI as it is a single chip Ethernet solution. I think that the Coldfire is the only other single chip solution.

Cheers,

Peter.

6
µTasker general / Re: New USB MSD Boot Loader
« on: June 07, 2011, 01:18:03 AM »
Very Nice, now I must get a Kinetis demo kit.

I'm looking at new processors at the moment and am either going towards the Kinetis or NXP LPC17xx. Not sure how avaliable Kinetis K60 parts are yet.

Cheers

Martin

Hi Martin,

Are you changing from the LM3 parts due to supply issues? I ask as I am looking at dumping the TI  parts and changing to another processor.

Cheers,

Peter.

7
µTasker general / Re: New USB MSD Boot Loader
« on: June 06, 2011, 01:45:51 AM »
Hi Mark,

Does this work with the TI LM3s9B92 processors?

Cheers,

Peter.

8
MODBUS / Re: Modbus Timeout Error
« on: December 09, 2010, 01:03:18 AM »
Hi Martin,

If the Modbus slaves are not your design, then they will probably follow the recommendations in the Modbus_over_serial_line_V1.pdf  document.  It recommends that for baud rates greater than 19200 bps a value of 1.750mS delay be used for the inter-frame delay.

You would need to allow a slave this delay to detect the request, some time to process it, then reply. Obviously if you are designing the slaves, you could shorten this.

You could also do the sums to see if ascii mode is more efficient as there are no delays involved, just longer messages.

Cheers,

Peter.


9
µTasker general / Re: How to use NUMBER_EXTERNAL_SERIAL
« on: October 26, 2010, 04:52:32 AM »
Hi Mark, Martin,

I'm looking at adding a couple of more UARTS via SPI through the SC16IS7xx chips.

What is it that I need to do to uTasker to get this going? Are there additional header files or code modules that I need?

Cheers,

Peter.

10
Luminary Micro TM LM3SXXXX / Re: Responding to TI's Finder utility
« on: October 01, 2010, 02:09:36 PM »
Hi Martin,

Thanks for that, I appreciate it. I figured it out in the end.  I've downloaded you code to check how well I've done. :)



Cheers,

Peter.

11
Luminary Micro TM LM3SXXXX / Re: Responding to TI's Finder utility
« on: September 30, 2010, 12:05:44 AM »
Hi Mark,

Thankyou. That's very helpful.

Cheers,

Peter.

12
Luminary Micro TM LM3SXXXX / Re: Responding to TI's Finder utility
« on: September 29, 2010, 12:36:50 AM »
Hi Mark,

Thanks for the reply.

How do I set up  to get the UDP demo to respond as the finder application is broadcasting the message (using the IP address 255.255.255.255)

Do I need to do any setup to get the udp demo to respond to broadcast  packets? Or is it that  udp will receive any broadcast packet if it is on the set up port?  (probably showing my lack of IP knowledge :) )

Cheers,

Peter.

13
Luminary Micro TM LM3SXXXX / Responding to TI's Finder utility
« on: September 28, 2010, 08:03:54 AM »
Hi Mark,

I want my application to respond to TI's Finder application.

The Finder application is a utility that communicates via UDP (Port 23 I think which is normally the telnet port)

The purpose of Finder is to locate Stellaris  boards on the LAN, and display their MAC and IP address  so the user can see what IP address has been assigned by DHCP, etc.

The source code for the PC application is in the Stellarwise tool/finder directory. The source for the target boards is in;
utils/locator.c, and .h


The finder broadcasts a UDP message on port 23.  The target boards bind to port 23 setup to respond to any IP address.

Is it possible to setup a UDP listener that will receive the broadcast UDP packet?

Cheers,

Peter.




14
µTasker general / Re: fnDebugChar()
« on: September 21, 2010, 01:07:43 AM »
Hi Mark,

Thanks for that. I'll use the define.

Cheers,

Peter.

15
µTasker general / Re: fnDebugChar()
« on: September 20, 2010, 04:07:06 PM »
Hi Mark,

It would jut send a character to the debug serial port.

void fnDebugChar(CHAR ch)

Cheers,

Peter.

Pages: [1] 2 3 4