1
µTasker general / Re: DDNS Support
« on: November 12, 2011, 05:05:19 AM »
Nice
Thank you
Thank you
News:
Nov 2020: uTasker i.MX RT V1.4.12 is productive - with complete secure loading concept.
Follow uTasker updates at www.twitter.com/uTasker !!
Online Forum registration has now been disabled. Please send an email to an address at the bottom of the home page with your preferred user name and email address if you would like an account.
Return to uTasker main site: www.utasker.com
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Pages: [1]
2
NXPTM M522XX, KINETIS and i.MX RT / Re: Kinetis development - improved stability
« on: October 29, 2011, 10:09:11 PM »
Great job Mark !
I think Kinetis will be your prototype platform for uTask tests, as you pointed in other topic, right ?
I think Kinetis will be your prototype platform for uTask tests, as you pointed in other topic, right ?
3
µTasker general / DDNS Support
« on: June 30, 2011, 05:50:36 AM »
Hi all
How to implement a DDNS client in uTasker?
How to implement a DDNS client in uTasker?
4
µTasker general / Re: uTasker Documentation and Operation
« on: June 04, 2010, 03:11:47 AM »
I believe the features and business model adopted by Utasker result in a milestone in the embedded technology market.
A set of identical solutions to UTasker, from any competitor can cost 20 or 30k, and in many cases, one license per product and not per platform.
The business model of UTasker is innovative.
I hope the project continues maturing and gaining more and more users around the world
I'm deciding what uC core to work, AVR32 or ARM, but I will buy the license and will have UTasker as main technological partner.
I just would like to see uTasker being developed by a team, instead of a single developer.
I think, this way, improvements and competitiveness would be even better.
A set of identical solutions to UTasker, from any competitor can cost 20 or 30k, and in many cases, one license per product and not per platform.
The business model of UTasker is innovative.
I hope the project continues maturing and gaining more and more users around the world
I'm deciding what uC core to work, AVR32 or ARM, but I will buy the license and will have UTasker as main technological partner.
I just would like to see uTasker being developed by a team, instead of a single developer.
I think, this way, improvements and competitiveness would be even better.
Pages: [1]